I was over at Blackfive when I saw this post by Uncle Jimbo. It examines a column by a former federal prosecutor (under Clinton), who also served as a legal advisor to the National Security Council. The column rips apart Judge Anna Diggs-Taylor's recent ruling against the terrorist surveillance program. Apparently, Judge Diggs-Taylor either willfully ignored the statutory and case law that applies to the program, or she lacks even a remote understanding of said law. My money's on willfull ignorance. What do you think?
All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.� Get a free 90-day trial!